examine in more detail in the next module), then they set up the topics that will be explored in the rest of the book.

examine in more detail in the next module), then they set up the topics that will be explored in the rest of the book.

In Chapter 1, Rainie and Wellman establish the basic premise of the book. They point out that social life is traditionally studied in terms of groups. In other words, if I wanted to evaluate the social support available to a given person, I’d want to look at what groups they were involved in (e.g., clubs, family, religious organizations) and go from there. However, the authors suggest, based on their own observation and some developments in social research, that contemporary social life is better described in terms of social networks. They argue that there are three crucial revolutions that contributed to this situation (which we will examine in more detail in the next module), then they set up the topics that will be explored in the rest of the book.

  1. What do Rainie and Wellman mean when they say we have moved into an age of networked individualism? If networked individualism is the modern form of social relationships, what were some of its previous forms? Ultimately, is the rise of the networked individual a positive development, in your opinion? Why or why not?

The readings from the two chapters by Fuchs present an introduction to the concept of social media and begin to outline a critical analysis of social media. One important discussion (that you will find in most writings about technology today) revolves around the concept of Web 2.0.

  1. In YOUR words, what distinguishes Web 1.0 from Web 2.0? Would you describe your life on the internet as being shaped more by Web 1.0 or Web 2.0 experiences? How so?

Taken together, these readings suggest that social media is distinct from – but related to – the concept of social networks. With this in mind,

  1. In YOUR words, distinguish between social networks and social media. Does the use of social media necessarily constitute social networking? Why or why not?

Module 3 Discussion- SnapChat Group

  1. What are the potential dangers posed to society by closed networks, such as those shown on page 54 of Networked? Considering what you’ve learned about social networks, how might we go about bridging closed political networks to facilitate more open interaction and exchange of information and ideas?
  2. Identify and briefly (in 1-2 sentences) describe each of the four subcultures discussed in Networked Chapter 3 in your own terms. How much influence do you think each subculture has right now? (Go into some detail about which subculture you think is MOST important and why; this should give your classmates something interesting to comment on).
  3. What are the major consequences of a hyperconnected population, both for individuals and society? Is “absent presence” a problem for contemporary society? Do the potential benefits of “connected presence” and “present absence” outweigh the potential problems related to the Mobile Revolution? Why?

Module 4 Discussion – SnapChat Group

Rainie and Wellman dive into the implications of The Triple Revolution in this chapter, focusing on changes to North American households.

  1. What are the most important changes to U.S. households since the 1970s? Using supporting evidence from the book, why are American households different now than they were 40 years ago? Are the recent changes a net positive or a net negative? Why or why not (draw from the book in your answer)?

Moving on to social media specific information, Rainie and Wellman discuss how the use of ICTs has changed the way family members interact with one another. With that in mind, answer the following:

  1. Based on Networked, would you say that families interact with one another more or less than they did prior to the advent of ICTs? Why? Specifically, how has the advent of ICTs altered the parent-child relationship? What do parents have to take into consideration now compared to before the rise of ICTs?

Household changes since the 1970s have had an impact on how mass media functions as a social institution. According to Silverblatt, mass media has assumed a number of the functions that were previously addressed by other institutions (e.g., religious and educational organizations). He further points out that “media systems were never intended to serve as a social institution” (original emphasis, p. 40).

  1. Does intention really matter? How might mass media (in the U.S.) “function” differently if it had been intentionally created to meet these needs?

Module 5 Discussion – SnapChat Group

Using Networked as a reference, respond to the following discussion questions. You should aim to include a good balance of information from the text and your own impressions, experiences (if applicable), and critiques.

Which of the trends in the changing nature of work has the biggest impact on our social reality in general?
What are some of the positive effects of working in the digital age in terms of our social experiences? What are some of the negative effects?
How should we, as a society, respond to the emerging challenges of working in the 21st century?
Module 6 Discussion – SnapChat Group

  1. Fuchs discusses different models of media organization. He defines capitalist media, as well as alternative models of public media and civil society media. Define each type IN YOUR OWN WORDS and identify at least one example of each. Review the main websites and/or social media sites of these examples and suggest how each one influences a political public sphere.
  2. Do you agree with Fuchs (and Dean and Gladwell and Morozov) that social media (as it exists today) cannot constitute a political public sphere? Fuchs suggests that true social change can only come from public (and potentially risky, as suggested by Gladwell) protests and collective action. Do you agree? Can you identify any specific examples that would help support the arguments of Shirky, Papacharissi, or boyd?
  3. What do you think about Fuchs’ suggestion that we should use a “left realist” approach to hate speech and violence on social media? (He details this position in the last paragraph on page 241.) What barriers exist to the implementation of this approach?

Module 6 Discussion – SnapChat Group

  1. Fuchs discusses different models of media organization. He defines capitalist media, as well as alternative models of public media and civil society media. Define each type IN YOUR OWN WORDS and identify at least one example of each. Review the main websites and/or social media sites of these examples and suggest how each one influences a political public sphere.
  2. Do you agree with Fuchs (and Dean and Gladwell and Morozov) that social media (as it exists today) cannot constitute a political public sphere? Fuchs suggests that true social change can only come from public (and potentially risky, as suggested by Gladwell) protests and collective action. Do you agree? Can you identify any specific examples that would help support the arguments of Shirky, Papacharissi, or boyd?
  3. What do you think about Fuchs’ suggestion that we should use a “left realist” approach to hate speech and violence on social media? (He details this position in the last paragraph on page 241.) What barriers exist to the implementation of this approach?

Module 7 Discussion – SnapChat Group

Witte and Mannon include a section in their book about the implications of differential social media usage on digital privacy (pp 149-152). Although this book was published in 2010, the data were collected in 2007.

  1. So, how has the practice of digital privacy changed in 10 years? What kinds of personal information do social media companies collect and how do they use this information? How do other institutions (i.e., governments – domestic and abroad, law enforcement, employers) use the information available on social media? What concerns do (should?) individuals have about digital privacy in the social media landscape in 2017?

At one point, Witte and Mannon ask about the possibility of virtual communities – is it possible to have online relationships characterized by Gemeinshaft and not just Gesellschaft (Toennies)? Essentially, the authors are asking if co-presence (sharing physical space) is necessary for building “true” community.

  1. What do you think? Is it possible to build Gemeinshaft-based communities online? What are some examples of virtual groups/situations where this could happen? How would this be achieved (or hindered) with social media?
  2. Do you take a techo-optimist, techno-ambivalence, or techo-pessimist view of the potential for social media to influence social movement success? Explain why you feel the way you do. Be sure to use examples and evidence to back up your position.

Module 8 Discussion – SnapChat Group

The post examine in more detail in the next module), then they set up the topics that will be explored in the rest of the book. appeared first on best homeworkhelp.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"