How would understanding the concept of opportunity costs
Referring to the table below, hiring a driver costs $10. Each machine costs $100. Which method should he use and why?
η= 1.5 η I = 1.2 η xy1 = 0.5 η xy2 = -0.5
η is the price elasticity of demand for Dunkin Donuts (DD) glazed doughnuts, ηxy1 is the cross elasticity of demand between DD glazed doughnuts and Krispy Kreme (KK) glazed doughnuts, ηxy2 is the cross elasticity of demand between DD glazed doughnuts and DD French Vanilla coffee, and η I is the income elasticity of DD glazed doughnuts.
a) If you want to increase your sales of glazed doughnuts by 30%, in what direction and by how much do you need to change the price?
b) If you make the percentage price change that you calculated in part a) will total revenue increase or decrease? How do you know?
c) Krispy Kreme lowers its price of glazed doughnuts by 20%. The demand for Dunkin Donuts glazed doughnuts will change by what percentage and in what direction?
d) Dunkin Donuts raises the price of its French Vanilla coffee by 15%. The demand for Dunkin Donuts glazed doughnuts will change by what percentage and in what direction?
e) If average income increases by 5% by what percentage and in what direction will the demand for Dunkin Donuts glazed doughnuts change? Are DD glazed doughnuts a normal good or an inferior good and how do you know?
Payoffs in dollars of profit.
a) (2 pts.) Which strategy offers both Westinghouse and General Electric the best financial outcome?
b) (2 pts.) Does either firm have a dominant strategy? If yes, which firm and what strategy?
c) (4 pts.) The Nash equilibrium is for Westinghouse to set its price at _ and earn a profit of _ and for General Electric to set its price at __ and earn a profit of _.
d) (2 pts.) Why do we see that the strategy that results is not the strategy that offers both players the best financial outcome?
The post How would understanding the concept of opportunity costs appeared first on best homeworkhelp.