Where are there weak points in your source’s arguments?

Where are there weak points in your source’s arguments?

Prompt: Use the three Secondary Sources located under “Article Citation” and explain in the chart below how you think the historical context of the time when these articles were written may have impacted the authors’ interpretations of the events. You are encouraged to check out www.ushistory.org/us/60.asp to help you formulate your thoughts on the historical context of your articles.

· As you read through each article, consider the three main questions for analyzing secondary sources

1. What argument is your source’s author making? (This is the thesis statement.)
2. Why is your source’s author making this argument? What is at stake for him or her?
3. Where are there weak points in your source’s arguments? Do you see any potential bias or flaws in your source’s argument

Historical Context

Article Citation

Historical Context of Publication Date

Impact of Historical Context on Author’s Thesis

Frisch, D. H. (1970). Scientists and

the decision to bomb

Japan.

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 26

(6), 107

–

1. Retrieved from

ro&d

b=ahl&AN=21569493&site=ehost

–

live&scope=site

Reynolds, M. L.,

& Lynch, F. X. (1955). Atomic

bomb

injur

ies among survivors in Hiroshi

ma.

Public Health Reports, 70

(3), 261

–

1. Retrieved from

://www.jstor.org/stable/4589041

Voynick, Steve (2009) “From Radium to the A-Bomb.” History Magazine. 10(4), 25-29. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=khh&AN=37791674&site=edslive&scope=site

image1.jpg

The post Where are there weak points in your source’s arguments? appeared first on best homeworkhelp.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"